On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 09:30:36AM -0800, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > Haskellers!
Hi Simon :-) > It's that time of the month. I'm putting out the November release > of the Revised Haskell 98 Report. As ever, I earnestly seek your > feedback. Especially I'd like to know whether I have stumbled > in rewriting the section about Enum in the light of recent email. > > http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/haskell98-revised http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/haskell98-revised/haskell98-report-html/index.html says "Revised: October 2001" - am I seeing the latest version? Actually, http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/haskell98-revised/haskell98-report-html/syntax-iso.html has "November 2001" at the bottom so I guess I am. You still have lexeme -> ... | qop | ... in the lexical syntax but have qop -> qvarop | qconop in the context-free syntax - is this deliberate? It really sucks IMO. > My plan is to iterate just once more (early Dec), and then freeze > the report at Christmas. I'm getting tired! :-) Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell