> The lexical syntax says that
> 10e3
> means
> 10 e3
> (i.e. two lexemes). I don't like this choice, and it could be "fixed"
> in the Revised H98 report.
What is the likelihood of anyone *intentionally* writing an integer
abutted directly with a varid, followed directly by another integer,
and no intervening whitespace? Nil, unless you are entering an
obfuscated code contest, I reckon. This looks like a good change
to me.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
