Folks There was a short thread relating to Malcolm's proposal, below. The tenor of the discussion was that indeed his proposal makes sense. It excludes no programs, and makes the language more consistent.
I propose to adopt it. Simon -----Original Message----- From: Malcolm Wallace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2002 11:08 To: Haskell list Subject: Another H'98 Report query The revised H'98 Report, in the section on Modules, 5.2 (Export Lists), under the description of the forms T (c_i,...) and C (f_i,...) for explicitly named constructors, fieldnames, and methods of the respective type or class, says: The subordinate names c_i (f_i) must not contain duplicates. Yet later in the text it is stated that Exports lists are cumulative: the set of entities exported by an export list is the union of the entities exported by the individual items of the list. I see no reason to disallow duplicates at the subordinate level if they are permitted otherwise. Examples: module M (T,T(C))) where -- legal module M (T(),T(C))) where -- legal module M (T(C),T(C))) where -- legal module M (T(C,C)) where -- illegal I propose we should drop the text that disallows duplicates, to make the last example legal. Regards, Malcolm _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
