On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 03:38:59PM +0100, Bjorn Lisper wrote: > I think MATLAB's matrix language provides about the right level of > abstraction for a high-level matrix language. You can for instance write > things like > > Y = inv(A)*B > > to assign to Y the solution of Ax = B. ...
Just a comment on a long post... I am personally found of MetaFont's approach, where you write Ax = B to find the solution to Ax = B. When working with transformations and such, being able to write all your equations "forwards" makes it much easier to keep everything straight; plus, if you have several equations for a variable, you don't have to figure out how to gather them together. Can anyone see a way to implement something like this in Haskell? Or is it better to make a small interpreted language? Best, Dylan Thurston
msg10237/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature