Folks
Following a good deal of email I now propose to
DO NOTHING
to the rules defining do-notation in the Haskell 98 Report.
That means that GHC and Hugs, and nhc perhaps, should
change so that they actually implement the do-notation
translation rule
do {e ; stmts} = e >> do {stmts}
using (>>) and not (>>=).
>From my reading of the email, some people will agree strongly,
and no one will disagree strongly. I suppose I could be wrong about
this, though.
Simon
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
