Hi, I have some questions regarding the hierarchical module system now implemented in Hugs as well as in GHC. Currently it is possible to have a module A1.A2. ... .Am and a module A1.A2. ... .Am. ... .An (n > m) at the same time. The first one's source code would be in file <root>/A1/A2/ ... /Am.hs and the second one's in file <root>/A1/A2/ ... /Am/ ... /An.hs. So there would be both a Am.hs file and a Am directory in the same directory. A1.A2. ... .Am would have two meanings: a module and a "module container". Hugs and GHC doesn't seem to have problems with this. But I want to know if I can rely on this behaviour still beeing present in future implementations and if this kind of module organisation is maybe considered bad practice.
Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
