> Blargh. Excellent point. I had totally forgotten that. I withdraw all > suggested changes except a cross-ref to the section you mention. Sigh. > My brain is getting soft.
Actually the rules referenced appear immediately above, so no reference is necessary. My original message was not suggesting a change to the report (though I don't know that I agree with it -- i can see arguments in each direction): I was primarily pointing out an infelicity in GHCs implementation... Out of curiousity, it's a bit strange that > data D = D !Int > myD = D {} in invalid, but > newtype N = N !Int > myN = N {} is not. Not that I'm proposing a change...I just think it's od.. - Hal _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell