Yoann Padioleau writes: > nevertheless i found constructor class more elegant for many problems. > Your solution is less elegant that the one using constructor classes. >
Yes, the current presentation of constructor classes might be easier to comprehend. > I found too that type error messages of class using functionnal depedencies > are not easy to read. There is often ambiguity in code that are not easy to solver. > this problem does not appear with constructor classes. > Well, that's the point of my encoding of functors using FD's. No ambiguities will arise! The issue I want to raise is whether constructor classes are redundant in the presence of FDs (yes, yes, we still might want to stick to the constructor class representation, but that's a different issue). Martin _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
