Curly enough... Thanks,
David -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hal Daume III Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:40 PM To: David Bergman Cc: 'Haskell Mailing List' Subject: RE: "cartesian classes" > A very concrete, but naïve, question: what is the syntax for defining > functional dependencies in Hugs and GHC? Since Mark Jones' syntax was > abstract in his paper, it is kind of hard to deduce an ASCII equivalence > (I have tried to figure out how to create a curly arrow from the > keyboard ;-) I can't comment on the rest, but for this: class Foo a b c e | a b -> c, b -> c d where ... means "a and b together determing c, and b by itself determines c and d" _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
