On Monday 16 December 2002 18:18, Ashley Yakeley wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Hal Daume III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I spent about a half hour toying around with this and came up with the > > following, which seems to work (in ghci, but not hugs -- question for > > smart people: which is correct, if either?)... > > Both are correct. Hugs fails (correctly) because it doesn't have > anything like -fallow-overlapping-instances.
Urr... I think hugs "invented" overlapping instances - or at least Mark Jones did... ;-) Try `+o'. --Jeff _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
