In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 Ben Rudiak-Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The proposed notation seems to be almost the same as the existing
> field-label notation semantically as well as syntactically, which suggests
> that it wouldn't be a destabilizing addition. (See section 2.5.)

Might these be unified in any useful way?

-- 
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA

_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Reply via email to