G'day all. Quoting John Meacham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Something I'd like to see (perhaps a bit less > drastic) would be a String class, similar to Num so string constants > would have type > String a => a Interesting that you mention this. I've also been thinking about this lately in the context of the discussion on collections and the left-fold combinator both here and on LtU. When people say "I want String to be [Char]", what I'm actually hearing is "I want String to be a collection of Char". I may be mishearing. Cheers, Andrew Bromage _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
