John Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The intention in the report was to match in the order listed in the
> pattern - you need not consult the data declaration to understand the
> ordering. I think the report is clear enough - it's just a bug in
> ghc.
Just to be sure, I've added a clarification to the Report on the
errata page.
http://www.haskell.org/definition/haskell98-revised-bugs.html
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell