> case t of > (x, y, z) -> (x, y, z+1) How would you do:
case t of
(x, y, z, a, b, c) -> (x+1, y, z, a, b, c+2)
would you allow:
case t of
(ctx @> x, _, _, _, _, ctx @> c) -> ctx (x+1) (c+2)
-- Stefan
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
