I agree with all of that. :)

        -- Lennart

Thomas Davie wrote:
I may be barking up the wrong tree here, but I think the key to this discussion is that real numbers are not bounded, while doubles are bounded. One cannot say what the smallest or largest real number are, but one can say what the smallest or largest double are (and it is unfortunately implementation specific, and probably pretty messy to set up). We could define maxBound as (2^(mantisa_space))^(2^(exponent_space)) and min bound pretty similarly... But I'm sure that everyone will agree that this is a horrible hack.

One may even question whether Doubles should be bounded, in that they are an attempt to represent real numbers, and as such should come as close as is possible to being real numbers (meaning not having bounds).

Sorry for a possibly irrelevant ramble.

Bob

On Mar 13, 2005, at 11:02 PM, Lennart Augustsson wrote:

And what would you have minBound and maxBound be?
I guess you could use +/- the maximum value representable.
Going for infinity is rather dodgy, and assumes an FP
representation that has infinity.

    -- Lennart

Frederik Eaton wrote:

Interesting. In that case, I would agree that portability seems like
another reason to define a Bounded instance for Double. That way users
could call 'maxBound' and 'minBound' rather than 1/0 and -(1/0)...
Frederik
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:10:33AM +0100, Lennart Augustsson wrote:

Haskell does not guarantee that 1/0 is well defined,
nor that -(1/0) is different from 1/0.
While the former is true for IEEE floating point numbers,
the latter is only true when using affine infinities.

    -- Lennart

Frederik Eaton wrote:

Shouldn't Double, Float, etc. be instances of Bounded?

I've declared e.g.

instance Bounded Double where
  minBound = -(1/0)
  maxBound = 1/0

in a module where I needed it and there doesn't seem to be any issue
with the definition...

Frederik




_______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell


_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell


_______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Reply via email to