Colin Runciman wrote: > output are less than a line! However, there is no need to build > line-buffering into the system, because it is easily defined in Haskell: > > buffer xs = foldl const xs xs
I don't find it this easy nor a good programming practise. My interaction depends on the (subtle order of) evaluation of a pure and total function? Cheers Christian _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
