On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:25:00PM +0200, Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> On Friday 16 September 2005 18:40, Glynn Clements wrote:
> > Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > > In Haskell, code is data too because code in the sense of
> > > imperative actions is described by IO values. You cannot analyse
> > > them.
> >
> > And thus they are not data.
>
> Huh? I'd say they are not /concrete/ data, but (abstract) data they
> surely are(?)
and you are certainly free to turn them into concrete data by creating
your own data type which you then can inspect and modify and then
"interpret".
John
--
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
