On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:25:00PM +0200, Benjamin Franksen wrote: > On Friday 16 September 2005 18:40, Glynn Clements wrote: > > Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > > > In Haskell, code is data too because code in the sense of > > > imperative actions is described by IO values. You cannot analyse > > > them. > > > > And thus they are not data. > > Huh? I'd say they are not /concrete/ data, but (abstract) data they > surely are(?)
and you are certainly free to turn them into concrete data by creating your own data type which you then can inspect and modify and then "interpret". John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell