On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, John Meacham wrote:
ideally we would want to split it up like so (but with more mathematically
precise names):
Might it also be reasonable to provide less mathematical names for some
classes, and possibly allow users to let the compiler know which ones they
find more readable? A lot of users would find Mappable more intuitive than
Functor for example, and the improved error messages might make it more
practical to call fmap map again.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ivanova is always right.
I will listen to Ivanova.
I will not ignore Ivanova's recomendations.
Ivanova is God.
And, if this ever happens again, Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out!
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
