I agree with Gour. I found txt2tags as a result of a discussion on the GTK2HS list. It is simple to use, readable as is, or easily transformable to a variety of targets. Also, it is consistent with bird-track literate Haskell, so I can run my .lhs documents through txt2tags and get html, latex, pretty text, or a bunch of things I haven't tried yet including *.doc (msword) (the latter via txt2tags for html, soffice to go from html to *.doc).
John Velman On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:29:24PM +0100, Gour wrote: > Simon Marlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > We already use DocBook XML, and I'm relatively pleased with it, except > > for the fact that it's far from easy to set up a working DocBook > > toolchain on your system unless your OS of choice is up to date and has > > a well-maintained set of DocBook packages. > > I consider that the structure of the present ghc manual does not need > such a rich markup as DocBook which is, imho, not very user-friendly. > > otoh, I'd prefer something simple (if you want to get contributions from > more users) like 'txt2tags' > > (see e.g. http://txt2tags.sourceforge.net/screenshots.html) > > which enables one to do lot with very simple markup. > > There are many targets supported, light sys-reqs, cli & gui, and even > syntax highlighting for (g)vim, emacs, kate... > > Sincerely, > Gour > > -- > Registered Linux User | #278493 > GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
