On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 15:12 +0100, Fraser Wilson wrote: > > > On 11/17/05, Joel Reymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I vote for a separate namespace for record access functions. > > I agree, but ... > > > My users now have to deal with tiGameID, blahBlahGameID, etc. > and > they are all the same. > > To solve this problem I just made them all instances of a class with a > gameId function. Still, not ideal.
That gives you a getter function but you would then need an extra setter function. Duncan _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
