[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Incidentally, the difficulty with finalizers was precisely the > argument for using enumerators rather than cursors in database > APIs. Takusen has implemented that idea; takusen currently supports > Sqlite, PostgreSQL and Oracle, has a test suite. Its performance test > shows that takusen can retrieve 2 million rows from a table without > running out of memory.
The differences between HDBC and HSQL have been recently discussed. Where does Takusen fit into this picture? From the above, it sounds like it has quite a different API. Are all 3 of these actively maintained? As someone who may wish to construct a haskell db binding for a new db, it's not clear to which API it should conform. Sometimes choice is a burden... Tim _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
