In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ft.com>, "Simon Peyton-Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My suggestion would be > > * One license for the Wiki. If a contributor wants to put up material > with a different license, then link to it as Udo suggested. (This also > makes it clear that the link is to material that is not to be edited by > others, whereas by definition the entire Wiki actively solicits editing > by others.) > > * That license should be maximally permissive. Anything viral defeats > B(ii). Preferably even more permissive than BSD (e.g. no obligation to > display a copyright notice. Who would the copyright notice be *to*?) > I'm not fussy about the details. Just some way of saying "You can do > what you like with this material". I think we're going for public domain, assuming we can also add text to satisfy German law, etc. The [[Project:Copyrights]] page will have the statement. The big question is the "one license" thing. Some people think other licenses should be allowed, provided they're marked on the page. <http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/HaskellWiki:Community_Portal#Mandatory.2F Optional_license_straw_poll> -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
