Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
* One license for the Wiki. If a contributor wants to put up material
with a different license, then link to it as Udo suggested. (This also
makes it clear that the link is to material that is not to be edited by
others, whereas by definition the entire Wiki actively solicits editing
by others.)
* That license should be maximally permissive. Anything viral defeats
B(ii). Preferably even more permissive than BSD (e.g. no obligation to
display a copyright notice. Who would the copyright notice be *to*?)
I'm not fussy about the details. Just some way of saying "You can do
what you like with this material".
We won't be able to include the Haskell 98 Report on the wiki (which is
intended to replace the entire haskell.org site) because it has a more
restrictive license.
--
Ashley Yakeley
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
