Frederik Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It looks nice, but don't you think the -package-base flag ought to >> take both the package name *and* the mountpoint?
> My intention was that -package-base specifies a base for the package > specified in the preceding -package flag [...] > In other words, it is an optional argument and the syntax is > ghc ... -package PACKAGE -package-base BASE ... How about something like ghc ... -package [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where the @BASE part is optional)? -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell