Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 00:20 schrieben Sie:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 07:29:21PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I urgently need Haddock support for type operators like in the following
> > code snippet:
> >
> > infix 2 :::, :=
> > infixl 9 :.:
> >
> > data name ::: value = name := value
> > newtype Composition f g a = Composition { runComposition :: f (g a) }
> > type (:.:) = Composition
> >
> > Does anybody know whether this is easy to implement or whether there is a
> > quick hack to make this work? Can I do the hacking myself or is deeper
> > knowledge of the Haddock source code necessary to provide this feature?
> >
> > Thank you in advance for any help.
>
> A much better solution would be to upgrade to David Waern's
> expiremental fork of Haddock, which does parsing using the GHC API and
> can handle all the syntactic constructs GHC can:
>
> http://darcs.haskell.org/SoC/haddock.ghc/
How mature is this? Is this an already finished Summer of Code project?
> Note that this installs an executable named 'haddock' which is
> sufficiently incompatible command line wise with the standard haddock
> to break Cabal's haddock support; you can work around this with (when
> configuring a program you want to haddock)
> --with-haddock=/path/to/old/haddock.
Hmm, in the light of this I might stay with the old Haddock modified by my
patch. I’d like Cabal’s Haddock support to work.
> Stefan
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
