No it doesn't, but it's on the TODO list. It needs a fix in GHC. By the way, I'm going to experiment with doing the parsing of comments on the Haddock side instead of in GHC. If that works out, we won't have to fix these things in GHC anymore.
If anyone wants to help out with Haddock, the darcs repository is at http://code.haskell.org/haddock David 2008/5/1 Gwern Branwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2008.05.01 15:42:19 +0200, David Waern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled 0.5K > characters: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm pleased to announce Haddock 2.1.0. > > > > Hackage page: > http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/haddock-2.1.0 > > > > Changes since last version: > > > > * Fix a bug that made links point to the defining module instead > > of the "best" one (e.g Int pointing to GHC.Base instead of Data.Int) > > > > * Fix a couple of smaller bugs > > > > * The representation of DocName was changed in the library > > > > * Add a flag --no-warnings for turning off warnings > > > > David > > Out of curiosity: does this release fix the 'type'/--^ bug? I know I kept > running into it on well-documented projects. > > -- > gwern > package Yakima Tzvrif Knife Tony Weekly Bob HRT TOS DJC > _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
