Nested constructed product returns? Or constructed sums?
lennart: > Well, yes and no. GHC actually does a decent job when given very > imperative code with references and mutable arrays. > Now the type I use to wrap the references to get type safe l-values > and r-values makes it tricker, and ghc lacks a crucial optimization > for specialization of constructor returns. > With that in place I think the code could be quite performant. _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
