Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2009 21:35 schrieb Ian Lynagh: > > > So, I'd be fine with Control.Reactive.FRP, Control.Reactive.Yampa, etc, > > > or even just Reactive.Yampa etc. > > > > Where should the modules of Conal’s reactive package be rooted then? > > Under Control.Reactive.Reactive? > > I don't know anything about the package, but if putting the modules > directly under Control.Reactive wouldn't make sense then it sounds to me > like the package name is poor (too generic).
reactive is a specific FRP implementation by Conal Elliott. So it shouldn’t be put directly under Control.Reactive since other reasonable FRP implementations exist. Best wishes, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
