[email protected] (Alex Ott) writes: > May be it's better to integrate my support for hlint completely? It has > some additional stuff - jumping to first error, application of hlint's > suggestions to source code, etc.?
I'm not sure whether it's best to include it or keep it separate -- that probably depends on whether there are (likely to be) alternatives so that they multiply in the mode. Actually, the right thing to do is to abstract this into a framework available to other modes with similar tools. Unfortunately there was no interest in the abstraction over languages/tools that Python mode was meant to start to avoid duplication/inconsistency with things like running inferior interpreters and checkers; the situation has got worse if anything. However, it might be worth doing that sort of thing anyway for others to pick up. I expect Haskellers to value abstraction and leadership more than Python bigots, at least ☹. _______________________________________________ Haskellmode-emacs mailing list [email protected] http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskellmode-emacs
