Re Ivan Lazar Miljenovic at "Fri, 02 Jul 2010 23:57:21 +1000" wrote: ILM> Alex Ott <[email protected]> writes: >> SOA> - I want the parser to be as accurate as possible. This essentially >> SOA> means reimplementing haskell-src-exts, unless I *use* >> SOA> haskell-src-exts. >> >> May be you can use semantic to make a parser? Semantic is already included >> into emacs, and I hope, that it will make life easier. Plus we'll >> automatically get lot of other functionality - name completion, navigation, >> etc.
ILM> My understanding is that semantic is more aimed at C-like languages (I ILM> seem to recall reading a discussion a while back about someone trying to ILM> use semantic to parse Python or something like that and failing), and as ILM> such wouldn't work too well for Haskell. There is parser for Python, written in Semantic (wisent). As I understand, it works. The problem that is left with Python - support for modules/libraries lookup, etc. I just remembered, that one men started to implement haskell grammar for cedet - it's available from http://github.com/hometown/cedet-haskell -- you can contact with him and discuss questions... -- With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA http://alexott.blogspot.com/ http://alexott.net http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Haskellmode-emacs mailing list [email protected] http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskellmode-emacs
