No, not quite. As far as I know, the only VCS that git supports are svn and cvs. In those cases, yes, you can pull from and push to the remote svn/cvs repository, but there are some restrictions on what you can do in the git repo (you have to rebase instead of merge, for example).
darcs-to-git is not part of git. It is a separate program that provides a one-way translation. I intend to maintain a branch that mirrors the darcs repo, and a separate branch with my patches rebased on top of that. On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic > > I haven't heard of anyone doing this, but do I dare ask why you > want to? > >> On 18.08.2010 6:43, Philip Weaver wrote: > >> Because I don't use darcs, I use git. > >> > >> It seems like a pretty common thing to do. There are mirrors of the > >> emacs repository and the ghc repository on github, for example. > > > > So with Git you can convert from any common VCS, do job in Git and push > changes > back to original VCS? > > Is some operation not interchangeable? > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskellmode-emacs mailing list > [email protected] > http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskellmode-emacs >
_______________________________________________ Haskellmode-emacs mailing list [email protected] http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskellmode-emacs
