On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:11:03AM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > I don't know which headers mutt is looking at, but it must be > looking at more than the ones that list-reply is documented to > check, because those contain only the h...@hates-software.com > address in several of the mails where mutt put both addresses in > the recipient line. > > The hates-software@siesta.unixbeard.net address is mentioned only > in delivery and mailing list headers and such that should, per > docs, not be getting consulted.
You have that backwards. The canonical list address is hates-software@siesta.unixbeard.net, that's why all the machinery in play refers to that. h...@hates-software.com was added as an alias one day as a convenient posting address when someone suggested it to me. I was probably drinking at the time. -- Richard Clamp <richa...@unixbeard.net>
