On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:43:51AM -0500, num...@deathwyrm.com wrote: > Philip Newton wrote: > >It even lets you mix the two with REPLACE INTO, which will do an > >INSERT, unless the record is already present, in which case it'll do > >an UPDATE instead. > Rather, it does a DELETE then an INSERT. Which I'd rate slightly more > hateful, since it's another entry towards any auto-insert fields running > out of numbers. But it probably depends on the situation.
It's also going to fuck you over if you've got any relevant triggers. Of course, they're probably only supported in the next version so that's OK. -- David Cantrell | Minister for Arbitrary Justice You can't spell "slaughter" without "laughter"
