Peter da Silva wrote: > On 2008-01-13, at 18:25, Robert Rothenberg wrote: >> Somewhere I recall *strong* advice to the affect that if one uses >> either numeric versions (e.g. 1.23) that one should not switch to >> extended multi-dot versions (e.g. 1.2.3) or visa versa in a later >> release. > > If "1.23" is treated differently from "1.23.0" that's just stupid. > Oh, and hateful.
Hateful is when you can't know what comes after 1.9. Is it 1.10? Or 2.0? In other words, sometimes it's a tuple of integers, sometimes it's floating point number. Hell. > >