Peter da Silva wrote:
> On 2008-01-13, at 18:25, Robert Rothenberg wrote:
>> Somewhere I recall *strong* advice to the affect that if one uses  
>> either numeric versions (e.g. 1.23) that one should not switch to  
>> extended multi-dot versions (e.g. 1.2.3) or visa versa in a later  
>> release.
> 
> If "1.23" is treated differently from "1.23.0" that's just stupid.  
> Oh, and hateful.

Hateful is when you can't know what comes after 1.9.  Is it 1.10?
Or 2.0?  In other words, sometimes it's a tuple of integers, sometimes
it's floating point number.  Hell.

> 
> 

Reply via email to