It was thus said that the Great Gerry Lawrence once stated: > Sean Conner wrote: > >So, can anyone here explain the rather hateful practice of ezmlm > >ofignoring the From: header and using the Return-Path: header? I've > >read DanBernstein's justification for this [1], but while the > >individual words arein English, together the words don't make sense. > > Huh? Um, I don't think ezmlm messes with reply-to by default. YOU can > mess with reply-to (see below) and many list owners do so --
It's not munging with Reply-To:. I subscribed to the list. The From: header contained "spc at conman.org". The Return-Path: contained "spc at brevard.conman.org". Guess which address ezmlm used to subscribe me to? -spc (*THAT'S* what I'm talking about!)
