> Quite. The mbox format even got its own RFC[1], basically > documenting that it's widely unstandardized (read: broken) and, in an > appendix, specifying a 'default' mbox format which, even if > universally implemented to the exclusion of all other mbox formats, > would still be broken. > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4155 > > The mbox format meant well, but it's been corrupted beyond hope of > salvation. Now it must die.
Hey, it could be worse, at least it's not format-fucked. (Re: http://nick.hates-software.com/2004/06/30/33b6b8a1.html) > Josh > > > >
