----- Forwarded message from "MDaemon at mail.XXX" <mdae...@xxx> -----
Envelope-to: n...@ccl4.org Delivery-date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:58:10 +0000 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:58:07 -0600 From: "MDaemon at mail.XXX" <mdae...@xxx> Reply-To: nore...@xxx Subject: No valid command found To: n...@ccl4.org X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: n...@ccl4.org X-Actual-From: mdae...@xxx X-Return-Path: <nore...@xxx> Your message does not contain a valid command for this mail server to process. No action has been taken. Message-ID: <20090124215708.gu95...@plum.flirble.org> >>From : n...@ccl4.org Date : Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:57:09 +0000 : Message contains [1] file attachments Please consider your environment responsibilities before printing this email. _______________________________________________________________________________________ XXX, Inc. accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. ----- End forwarded message ----- Mdaemon, according to the website, is "A trusted alternative to Microsoft Exchange" Now, the air-headed little thing as got itself subscribed to a well run mailing list, which for all its sins is not something I've ever known Exchange to manage. So clearly not all the "innovation" is in Washington State - Texas has its own supply of failure. As a thought experiment, I'm trying to work out the most plausibly-deniable way to get the software to self destruct and melt down. I had hoped for a help function, but sadly the firm running this vapid excuse for competence have a filter that deems my request for "help" to be "SPAM", so I'm without clue. Actually, maybe that's a feature, as now I stand a better chance of getting into the heads of the authors of this waste of effort, figuring out how it "works", and hence how to do their QA department's job for them. Nicholas Clark
