On 06/01/10 04:01 PM, Smylers wrote: >>> But this isn't XML; it's HTML. >> >> I wonder if serving the page with Content-Type "application/xhtml+xml" >> or "text/xml" would make any difference. > > Of course; that's what would make it be tret by browsers as XML. Saving > the page with a .xhtml extension and viewing the file locally with > Firefox makes the text display for me.
Well, the XHTML 1.0 spec says you can serve XHTML as "text/html" with the appropriate DOCTYPE and browsers are supposed to interpret it using XHTML rules... which it looks like Firefox isn't doing completely, especially if that fixes the problem. > (Did you mean to take this to private mail rather than the list?) Er, no... I intended to spread the hatred as far as possible. But unfortunately I can't blame software on this one, Thunderbird 3 does actually have a Reply to List button, I just didn't hit it. Oops. :)
