[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12682353#action_12682353
]
Jim Kellerman commented on HBASE-1249:
--------------------------------------
> Erik Holstad added a comment - 10/Mar/09 01:14 PM
>
> 2. I think that the setting of the timestamp should not be exposed to the
> user but, be set by HBase at all times. This limitation
> simplifies a lot when reasoning about the order across storefiles and client
> formats, to make it as fast, early outs and simple,
> list instead of map, as possible.
-1 Unless there is another "version" field. We have an application that makes
extensive use of timestamp at Powerset.
> Rearchitecting of server, client, API, key format, etc for 0.20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-1249
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1249
> Project: Hadoop HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jonathan Gray
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.20.0
>
>
> To discuss all the new and potential issues coming out of the change in key
> format (HBASE-1234): zero-copy reads, client binary protocol, update of API
> (HBASE-880), server optimizations, etc...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
