+1 I ran it without any problem for a while. I asked Mathias if 1784 should kill it and he thinks no since it is not deterministic.
J-D On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Tim Sell<[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Running smoothly. > ~Tim. > > 2009/8/19 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>: >> +1 >> >> Survived days of pounding with no observable performance regression. >> >> - Andy >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: stack <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:52:48 PM >> Subject: ANN: hbase 0.20.0 Release Candidate 2 available for download >> >> The second hbase 0.20.0 release candidate is available for download: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.0-candidate-2/ >> >> Near to 450 issues have been addressed since the 0.19 branch. Release notes >> are available here: http://su.pr/18zcEO <http://tinyurl.com/8xmyx9>. >> >> HBase 0.20.0 runs on Hadoop 0.20.0. Alot has changed since 0.19.x including >> configuration fundamentals. Be sure to read the 'Getting Started' >> documentation in 0.20.0 available here: http://su.pr/8YQjHO >> >> If you wish to bring your 0.19.x hbase data forward to 0.20.0, you will need >> to run a migration. See http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToMigrate. >> First read the overview and then go to the section, 'From 0.19.x to 0.20.x'. >> >> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.0? Please vote +1/-1 by >> Wednesday, August 25th. >> >> Yours, >> The HBasistas >> >> >> >> >
