[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850444#action_12850444
 ] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-2348:
---------------------------------------

Yikes! That is quite a patch. Let me apply it and try it out.

{quote}
SUBTLE BUT IMPORTANT: no longer have a separate lib directory under stargate, 
but bundle up stargate specific dependencies into the top level artifact lib 
directory. This actually means a faster assembly because there's no longer 
duplicate copy dependencies that suffer from the maven-fork-per-dependency 
problem we had recently, but it may not be what you want, because now the lib 
directory contains super-set of the dependencies for all modules now (maybe 
that is what you want anyway..)
{quote}

+1

I typically deploy Stargate by copying its dependencies in 
contrib/stargate/lib/ up into lib/, and the Stargate jar up to toplevel, then 
invoke stargate with the ./bin/hbase script. If I read you correctly, your 
proposal is what I end up with anyway.



> Stargate needs both JAR and WAR artifacts
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2348
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2348
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib
>    Affects Versions: 0.21.0
>            Reporter: Paul Smith
>            Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>         Attachments: hbase-stargatetweaks.diffstat, hbase-stargatetweaks.patch
>
>
> Since the move to Maven we have lost the ability to have Stargate bundled as 
> both a JAR and a WAR file (currently just the latter).
> I'm proposing to split the current stargate module further into 2 sub-modules 
> 'stargate-war' and 'stargate-core' (totally up for discussion on naming).  
> Basically moving existing sources down to 'stargate-core' and relocating the 
> conf section into the war sub-module.
> I'll be doing this via a github fork to make the review and merge process 
> easier.  However I suspect I'll do the Maven side ok but totally hose the Git 
> part, so strap yourselves in.. :)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to