[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868543#action_12868543
]
dhruba borthakur commented on HBASE-2531:
-----------------------------------------
> Going forward it will not be needed since the UUID will actually be part of
> the region name.
@Stack, thanks for the info. If the UUD is part of the regionname, then does
this mean that nothing needs to be done for this JIRA? If that is not the case
and we want to do somethinkg for this JIRS, can you pl explain what needs to be
done? Thanks.
> 32-bit encoding of regionnames waaaaaaayyyyy too susceptible to hash clashes
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-2531
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2531
> Project: Hadoop HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>
> Kannan tripped over two regionnames that hashed the same:
> Here is code demo'ing that his two names hash the same:
> {code}
> package org;
> import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Bytes;
> import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.JenkinsHash;
> public class Testing {
> public static void main(final String [] args) {
>
> System.out.println(encodeRegionName(Bytes.toBytes("test1,6838000000,1273541236167")));
>
> System.out.println(encodeRegionName(Bytes.toBytes("test1,0520100000,1273541610201")));
> }
> /**
> * @param regionName
> * @return the encodedName
> */
> public static int encodeRegionName(final byte [] regionName) {
> return Math.abs(JenkinsHash.getInstance().hash(regionName,
> regionName.length, 0));
> }
> }
> {code}
> Need new encoding mechanism. Will need to migrate old regions to new schema.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
