You are correct. There is no need to implement explicit connection pooling.
--- Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset > -----Original Message----- > From: Goel, Ankur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:29 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Connection Pool for HBase > > Is it a known issue filed in JIRA ? What's the issue number ? > > So assuming that this bug is fixed, there isn't a need to > implement explicit connection pooling, right? > > Thanks > -Ankur > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Kellerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 10:04 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Connection Pool for HBase > > We do have a connection pool in HTable, however we were > looking at a bug yesterday that suggested that some part of > it may not be thread safe (although it is supposed to be). > > --- > Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Goel, Ankur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:22 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Connection Pool for HBase > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > Do we have a connection pool implementation for Hbase. > > Basically I want to be able to write to Hbase from different > > application threads. > > > > Also, how is synchronisation taken care of if multiple > threads try to > > read/write to the same table ? > > > > Thanks > > -Ankur > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1327 - Release > > Date: 3/12/2008 1:27 PM > > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1327 - Release Date: > 3/12/2008 1:27 PM > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1327 - Release > Date: 3/12/2008 1:27 PM > > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1327 - Release Date: 3/12/2008 1:27 PM
