We use getRow() everytime we want a single row (we almost always want multiple columns).
We're running a patched version of TRUNK with light development usage, and have not seen any issues. So getRow() is important for us, but we won't use 0.1 so won't pollute the vote... -clint On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Jim Kellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +- 0: > > HBASE-673 is unresolved. Question (to the community): How important is > HTable.getRow ? If not so much, then we can move 673 to a future release or > make it wontfix for hbase-0.1.x. > > If it is important to you, please vote -1. > > --- > Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: stack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:02 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] >> Subject: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1 >> >> I've put up the first release candidate for hbase 0.1.3 here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-1/ >> >> (Candidates used to be zero-based. Lets make them 1-based >> from here on out. Its less confusing.) >> >> 0.1.3 fixes a couple of critical bugs. Please try it out --- >> run it, review documentation, etc. -- and let us know if any >> issues with this new version. >> >> Lets close the voting on release, Thursday, June 12th. >> >> To be clear, hbase 0.1.x versions require hadoop 0.16.x. >> >> Thanks, >> St.Ack >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG. >> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release >> Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM >> > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release Date: 6/10/2008 > 7:22 AM >
