HBASE-847 (and its sub-issues) will do the same for get. --- Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dingding Ye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 1:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Why timestamp only return results whose timestamp <= this > value > > Yes. It's very similar. Besides the scanner, i also need the same > functionality in getRow because i also need a range based on a row > key. > I have checked the getRow implemention and found that while trying to > get the data from the MapFile, it has the comparation: > > key.matchesWithoutColumn(readkey) > > This statement will return the data older than the specified timestamps. > > I agree that there will be some big changes to the server side codes. > Looking forward to that and hope i can help, :) > > Best regards. > > sishen > > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 3:43 AM, stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is HBASE-33 what you need? > > St.Ack > > > > Dingding Ye wrote: > >> > >> For example, i store some urls in the table. I want to find the urls > >> which are added today. > >> > >> i would like to specify the time to the beginning of today and get the > >> urls newer than the timestamp. > >> But the problem now is that the api will return the urls older than > >> the timestamp, but newer than the timestamp. > >> > >> What's the main thoughts to design such apis that return the older > >> data? Maybe the answer will help me understand > >> the project more, :) > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> sishen > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:00 AM, stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Dingding Ye wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> The query apis with timestamp such as getRow, getScanner will return > >>>> results whose timestamp <= this value. > >>>> But, Is the newer data more important than the older ones? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> Depends on your application but usually yes. > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Is there a way to get results whose timestamp >= this value? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> Not at the moment. > >>> > >>> Tell us more about your need Sishen. Maybe there is a workaround we > can > >>> figure. > >>> > >>> St.Ack > >>> > >>> > > > >
