Greetings Jon, A quick performance snapshot: I believe with our cluster of 18 nodes (8 cores, 8 GB RAM, 2 x 500 GB drives per node), we were inserting rows of about 5-10kb at the rate of 180,000 /second. That's on a completely untuned cluster. You could see much better performance with proper tweaking and LZO compression.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Jonathan Holloway < jonathan.hollo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was looking at the HBase Goes Realtime presentation yesterday and came > across these numbers: > > Tall Table 1 million rows with a single column > * Insert - 0.24 ms per row > * Read - 1.42ms per row > * Full Scan - 11 seconds > > Wide Table 1000 Rows with 20,000 columns > * Insert - 312 ms per row > * Random Read - 121 ms/row > * Full Scan - 146 seconds > > Fat Table 1000 Rows with 10 columns 1MB value > * Insert - 68 seconds > * Random Read - 56.92 ms/row > * Full Scan - 35 seconds > > I'm interested in understanding whether there are any up to date stats for > performance, especially with > regards to random reads on tables with approx 10 columns and n million > rows. I'm looking into running > a performance benchmark eventually, I just wondered whether anybody had any > stats to share? > > Many thanks, > Jon. > -- http://www.roadtofailure.com -- The Fringes of Scalability, Social Media, and Computer Science
