Seems like an intuitive option to me. Tim
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:04 PM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Kevin Peterson <kevin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> These kinds of cleaner APIs would be a good way to prevent the standard >> situation of one engineer on the team figuring out HBase, then others say >> "why is this so complicated" so they write an internal set of wrappers and >> utility methods. >> > > This wouldn't solve the problems for people who want a full ORM, but I think >> there's an in-between sweet spot that abstracts away byte[] but still >> exposes column families and such. >> > > > What do fellas think of Lars' George's genercizing (sp? word?) of the client > API? See his patch up in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1990. > Would this be enough? > St.Ack >
