Should those links be up on wiki? Are they "public"?
On Dec 22, 2009, at 19:25, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:
Edward,
This S3 URLs doesn't work for you?
http://iridiant.s3.amazonaws.com/hbase-0.20-0.20.2-1.cloudera.src.rpm
That's HBase 0.20.2 release.
- Andy
----- Original Message ----
From: Edward Capriolo <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, December 22, 2009 10:22:29 AM
Subject: Re: Updated HBASE RPMS
So should I stop rolling these?
I do not think so, cloudera is managing their own patch level and
they
are more likely to chose stability over latest and greatest. I liked
the layout and the init scripts, but I needed the more bleeding edge
features.
I did some searching but was not able to find your source.rpm. So I
just tweaked the 20.1 code for 20.2. It only took me a couple of
hours. Now I can probably patch in a new version in a few minutes.
I think we could definitely build out an ant target that prepares the
spec file. Having the .spec file as just a plain file in the contrib
would make it easier to find. The downside is a static spec file
could
fall out of date.
I really need the RPM for my own evil internal purposes :).Cloudera's
repo might be more heavily vetted then some might want. If that is a
general need that people share I do not mind running a repo for the
latest.
Edward
