> > Yes. But IIUC, the client is running a transaction that spans the update to
> > the two tables. It'll take care of the undo should say the update to the
> > transacation table fails.
> >
> Isn't the update to the secondary index implicitly done ? As in, does
> the client 'see' this update ?
> My impression was that the secondary index update was done by the
> indexedregion - and was not visible to the client : which manages occ
> transaction ...
Yes, you are correct. I think Stack just was not precise enough in his language.
- Andy
