Hi Erik, Wow, if this 10 times faster it worth at less elegance. About the further usage of the data, I'm going to access columns by name (random access) and i think creating the map will help me to speed up the access later, so i think in my case map is good enough. But, I also will consider the adaptation of our code to avoid map creation.
Thank You for quick reply. Best Regards. Slava. On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Erik Holstad <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Slava! > I actually think that iterating the list is going to be faster since you > don't have to create > the map first, but that kinda depends on how you are planning to use the > data afterwards, > but please let me know if you get a different result. > The reason that there isn't a more "elegant" way of getting the timestamp > is > that we > wanted to make everything as bare bones as possible to improve speed. > Creating the map from the list on the client side and getting your > timestamps is still > going to be about 10-100x faster then with your old code, hopefully :) > > -- > Regards Erik >
